What characteristic differentiates a "theory" from a "hypothesis" in health sciences?

A theory is a well-substantiated explanation that has been developed through extensive observation, experimentation, and critical analysis over time. It integrates various hypotheses that have been tested and supported by a body of evidence, making it a robust framework for understanding complex phenomena within the health sciences. Theories are not static; they evolve with new evidence and insights but are grounded in substantial empirical support.

In contrast, a hypothesis is a specific, testable prediction about a particular phenomenon. It is often formulated as a starting point for experimentation, allowing researchers to investigate relationships between variables. While hypotheses can inform the development of theories by providing specific conditions or outcomes to examine, they do not carry the same weight of evidence or comprehensive understanding as a theory does.

Understanding this distinction is crucial in scientific practice, as it allows researchers to differentiate between preliminary ideas that require testing (hypotheses) and well-established concepts that explain underlying principles across a range of observations (theories). This differentiation is essential for structuring research and applying scientific reasoning in health sciences.